Publikationen

The Pentacam®, particularly its Belin ABCD Progression Display, is an invaluable tool for corneal specialists. It provides a detailed, accurate assessment of the cornea, enabling early diagnosis, careful monitoring of disease progression, and informed decision-making regarding treatment options. This ultimately leads to better outcomes for patients with keratoconus.

Flap striae, or microscopic folds in the corneal flap created during LASIK, can cause visual disturbances such as blurred vision or halos around lights. Using the Pentacam® AXL Wave to monitor these conditions confers specific benefits that enhance both the diagnostic process and patient outcomes.

Isabella D. Baur, Gerd U. Auffarth, Maximilian K. Köppe, Grzegorz Labuz and Ramin Khoramnia

The study assessed the impact of tear optics on the repeatability of the Pentacam AXL Wave compared to the i-Trace. All measurements with Pentacam AXL Wave with OSI < 1 had excellent repeatability, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) ranging from 0.88 for HOA, to 0.92 for LOA. The Sw, TRT, and COV of all aberration measurements were significantly lower (better) than those of iTrace. Conclusion: Tear optics affected repeatability of Pentacam Wave and i-Trace. Pentacam Wave had better repeatability in eyes with a poor tear film as compared to i-Trace. The study assessed the impact of tear optics on the repeatability of the Pentacam AXL Wave compared to the i-Trace.

Besides the assessment of the device performance for normal and healthy eyes, even more interesting are their performance in abnormal - the challenging eyes. Due to the fact, that the Pentacam AXL Wave outperformed the i-Trace in the normal, healthy eye group anyway, only the repeatability of the Pentacam AXL Wave and the comparison between the two devices was analysed in the study. METHODS: In this cross-sectional, observational study, normal, keratoconus, and CXL groups with 125 eyes in each of the three groups were included. All eyes underwent three sets of measurements, at a single visit, using the Pentacam AXL Wave (Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH) and i-Trace (Tracey Technologies). Keratometry, pachymetry, objective refraction, and total ocular aberrations including. CONCLUSIONS: The Pentacam AXL Wave showed comparable repeatability in the normal and keratoconus groups, but was poorer in the CXL group.

Belin, Michael W. MD, FRANZCO; Jang, Hyun Soo MD; Borgstrom, Mark PhD, Cornea: June 09, 2021 - Volume Publish Ahead of Print - Issue - doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000002781

The Belin ABCD Progression Display Identifies Keratoconus Progression Earlier Than Conventional Metrics. A new study conducted by Dr Eray Atalay and Dr Onur Ozlap was published in the American Journal of Ophthalmology confirming the unique approach in the OCULUS Pentacam®. 277 eyes of 155 patients between 18 and 35 years of age where included with a maximum follow-up time of ten years.

Dubinsky-Pertzov B, Reinhardt O, Gazit I, Or L, Hecht I, Pras E, Einan-Lifshitz A. Cornea. 2021 Oct 1;40(10):1322-1329. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000002632.

This study assessed the repeatability and agreement of the Pentacam AXL Wave vs the i-Trace. Pentacam AXL Wave had repeatability with an ICC for total ocular aberrations ranging from 0.84 for HOAs to 0.92 for LOAs and for corneal from 0.76 for HOAs to 0.86 for LOAs. The Sw, TRT, and CoV of all aberrations were significantly lower (better) than those of iTrace (P < .001). … Conclusions: The repeatability estimates for wavefront aberrations using Pentacam AXL Wave were significantly better than those using i-Trace. Both devices showed excellent correlations for total ocular aberrations. This study assessed the repeatability and agreement of the Pentacam AXL Wave vs the i-Trace.

Kevin Chan OD, MS, FAAO, Dr. David Grosswald, Doktor der Optometrie, Dr. Brian Healey, Doktor der Optometrie, Christine W. Sindt, OD, FAAO, Kontaktlinsenspezialistin, Frank Widmer, Dipl.-Ing. (FH) Augenoptik, Mario Rehnert, Dipl.-Ing. (FH) Augenoptik, M.Sc. Optometry, Anwendungstechnik

Kevin Chan OD, MS, FAAO, Dr. David Grosswald, Doktor der Optometrie, Dr. Brian Healey, Doktor der Optometrie, Christine W. Sindt, OD, FAAO, Kontaktlinsenspezialistin, Frank Widmer, Dipl.-Ing. (FH) Augenoptik, Mario Rehnert, Dipl.-Ing. (FH) Augenoptik, M.Sc. Optometry, Anwendungstechnik

Vinciguerra, Riccardo MD; Belin, Michael W. MD; Borgia, Alfredo MD; Piscopo, Raffaele MD; Montericcio, Alessio MD; Confalonieri, Filippo MD; Legrottaglie, Emanuela F. MD; Rosetta, Pietro MD; Vinciguerra, Paolo MD, J Cataract Refract Surg. 2021 Jan 1;47(1):33-39. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000475.

The purpose of this review is to evaluate the usefulness of corneal topography to select premium intraocular lenses (IOLs), including aspherical IOLs, toric IOLs, and multifocal IOLs, in refractive cataract surgery ...So Goto, MD, PhD, Naoyuki Maeda, MD, PhD

Dr Auffarth, Dr Kohnen y Dr Savini comparten el Ãxito obtenido, con sus primeras experiencias, en aplicaciones clínicas con el Pentacam® AXL Wave.

Dr Auffarth, Dr Kohnen and Dr Savini share their first experiences from successful clinical applications with the Pentacam® AXL Wave.

Elias Flockerzi , Kassandra Xanthopoulou, Susanne Christiane Goebels, Elena Zemova, Sonia Razafimino, Loïc Hamon, Theresia Jullien, Ulrike Klühspies, Timo Eppig, Achim Langenbucher, Berthold Seitz, Br J Ophthalmol. 2021 Aug;105(8):1069-1075. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2020-316789. Epub 2020 Aug 23.

Kepa Balparda, Tatiana Herrera-Chalarca, Laura Andrea Silva-Quintero, Sneider Alexander Torres-Soto, Laura Segura-Muñoz, Claudia Marcela Vanegas-Ramirez, Clin Ophthalmol. 2020 Jun 30;14:1839-1845. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S261785. eCollection 2020.

By Cheryl Guttmann Krader; reviewed by Prof. Renato Ambrósio Jr, MD, PhD, Tomography brings novel abilities, but classic imaging technologies arenât going anywhere. The article is an e-reprint from Ophthalmology Times, March issue 2018, VOL. 43, NO.1

Marcus Blum, Kathleen S. Kunert; OPHTHALMO-CHIRURGIE 30: 191“194 (2018)

Sel S, Stange J, Kaiser D, Kiraly L., Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2017 Mar 22. pii: S1367-0484(16)30229-6. doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2017.03.007. [Epub ahead of print]